Found 35 bookmarks
Custom sorting
Here We Go Again (Citrix NetScaler DTLS Preauth Memory Overflow CVE-2026-88772)
Here We Go Again (Citrix NetScaler DTLS Preauth Memory Overflow CVE-2026-88772)
Part 1 of this week's saga can be found here. This research is a glimpse into the capabilities that power our Preemptive Exposure Management solution, enabling organizations to rapidly react to emerging threats: the watchTowr Platform. What Is A Citrix NetScaler? NetScaler, from Citrix (now under Cloud Software Group)
·labs.watchtowr.com·
Here We Go Again (Citrix NetScaler DTLS Preauth Memory Overflow CVE-2026-88772)
File Drop to RCE – CVE-2026-20217
File Drop to RCE – CVE-2026-20217
I remember watching Simon Scannell's REcon 2023 talk, You Have Become the Very Thing You Swore to Destroy, and being deeply impressed by how he turned ClamAV's own detection logic into an oracle for exploiting a service with no direct output channel. I remember hoping that, someday, I might have the
·securifera.com·
File Drop to RCE – CVE-2026-20217
Stack Overflows, Heap Overflows, and Existential Dread (SonicWall SMA100 CVE-2025-40596, CVE-2025-40597 and CVE-2025-40598)
Stack Overflows, Heap Overflows, and Existential Dread (SonicWall SMA100 CVE-2025-40596, CVE-2025-40597 and CVE-2025-40598)
It’s 2025, and at this point, we’re convinced there’s a secret industry-wide pledge: every network appliance must include at least one trivially avoidable HTTP header parsing bug - preferably pre-auth. Bonus points if it involves sscanf. If that’s the case, well done! SonicWall’s SMA100
·labs.watchtowr.com·
Stack Overflows, Heap Overflows, and Existential Dread (SonicWall SMA100 CVE-2025-40596, CVE-2025-40597 and CVE-2025-40598)
The Gold Mine Red Teamers Never Touch
The Gold Mine Red Teamers Never Touch
The Problem If you are like me, you have found yourself digging through Microsoft specifications and RFC documentation trying to wrangle with a new exploit or tooling to get DA faster than your peers. The biggest problem one may encounter is the specifications are meant for developers; they will tell you the song and dance in its entirety, but it never goes beyond in any way that may be useful for you to weaponize. Fixing that may potentially lay with using the Windows 2003 Source code.
·abdulmhsblog.com·
The Gold Mine Red Teamers Never Touch
Adobe Acrobat Reader Escript.api Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution - Exodus Intelligence
Adobe Acrobat Reader Escript.api Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution - Exodus Intelligence
Adobe Acrobat Reader Escript.api Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution By Michele Campa Overview In this blog post we take a look at a use-after-free vulnerability found in Adobe Acrobat Reader’s Escript.api module in February 2025. This issue was patched on April 2026 and likely assigned CVE-2026-34621,  CVE-2026-34626 , or CVE-2026-34622. Disclaimer: Every offset and function name referenced in this blog ... Read more Adobe Acrobat Reader Escript.api Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution
·blog.exodusintel.com·
Adobe Acrobat Reader Escript.api Use-After-Free Remote Code Execution - Exodus Intelligence
Finding CVE-2020-1321: Fuzzing Microsoft Office's 3D Model Parser - Ariel Koren
Finding CVE-2020-1321: Fuzzing Microsoft Office's 3D Model Parser - Ariel Koren
A grammar-driven .glb fuzzing campaign found a memory-corruption bug in the shared 3D parser used by Microsoft Word and the Microsoft 3D Viewer. The same input crashed both products at matching call-site offsets. Reported to the Microsoft Security Response Center on January 30, 2020. Microsoft published the fix on June 9, 2020 as the Microsoft Office Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, graded Important, CVSS 7.8, exploitation less likely.
·arielkoren.com·
Finding CVE-2020-1321: Fuzzing Microsoft Office's 3D Model Parser - Ariel Koren
CVE-2026-6307 (Part 2): Turbofan JS-to-Wasm Deopt Type Confusion - Tashita Software Security
CVE-2026-6307 (Part 2): Turbofan JS-to-Wasm Deopt Type Confusion - Tashita Software Security
Authored by stratan In Part 1, we went over the background details that are needed to follow along, as well as the trigger specifics of the bug. In Part 2, we'll go through the relevant code paths, analyze the patch, and develop an in-cage read/write primitive. Disclaimer This article has been prepared for
·tashita.net·
CVE-2026-6307 (Part 2): Turbofan JS-to-Wasm Deopt Type Confusion - Tashita Software Security
Zero-Click RCE in Figma Desktop: A Race-Conditioned Prototype Pollution Chain That Escapes the Plugin Sandbox
Zero-Click RCE in Figma Desktop: A Race-Conditioned Prototype Pollution Chain That Escapes the Plugin Sandbox
A prototype pollution bug in Figma’s variant counter, chained through a plugin-context race against $INTERNAL_DO_NOT_USE$RERUN_PLUGIN$, a jsx_debugging feature-flag flip, and a forgotten writeFileToPath IPC in the Electron desktop app, to achieve zero-click cross-platform RCE from a published plugin. Reported to Figma and patched within hours.
·lab.ctbb.show·
Zero-Click RCE in Figma Desktop: A Race-Conditioned Prototype Pollution Chain That Escapes the Plugin Sandbox
Living off the Process
Living off the Process
Hello again everyone! Hope the start to the new year is treating you well. I am excited to share a new blog post with you! Furthermore, I’d consider the content shared in today’s post to be the most time I’ve spent in researching a particular offensive security topic/technique 😹 I’d say I spent well over a month looking into this exciting topic and I wanted to make sure I had all my research completed before I jumped in to making a post. Without further ado, I give you my take on what I’d like to call: Living off the Process! This is a technique that does as the name implies: We use what is already available to us in the remote process of our choosing to accomplish a given goal. In this case, the goal will be to write shellcode indirectly into the remote process with as low of a footprint as possible. When I say indirectly, I mean we won’t be using WriteProcessMemory to write the shellcode. That API does play a small role, but ultimately we will be indirectly writing our shellcode in 8 byte chunks using ROP gadgets and assembly stubs all made available in the remote process. We will also avoid the creation of RWX regions of memory. Here’s a quick overview on how it all works. We will be looking for:
·g3tsyst3m.com·
Living off the Process
Windows 10 RCE: The exploit is in the link | Positive Security
Windows 10 RCE: The exploit is in the link | Positive Security
Chaining a misconfiguration in IE11/Edge Legacy with an argument injection in a Windows 10/11 default URI handler and a bypass for a previous Electron patch, we developed a drive-by RCE exploit for Windows 10. The main vulnerability in the ms-officecmd URI handler has not been patched yet and can also be triggered through other browsers (requires confirmation of an inconspicuous dialog) and desktop applications that allow URI opening.
·positive.security·
Windows 10 RCE: The exploit is in the link | Positive Security